As a Committed Free-Market Advocate, But Medicare for All Is the Best Hope for US Health System

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Neither the average employee. Selecting the appropriate healthcare insurance for our business – or for our families – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Medical System Is More Than Complex, It's Costly

According to recent research, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down because partisan disputes regarding tax credits which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. The existing system doesn't change. The way medical professionals get paid would change. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

A national health insurance program would require payments from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker making average wages pays about 5.3% to their healthcare. The company pays about 13.75%.

Does this appear like a lot? Not if you compare it to what average American pays. I can name dozens of businesses that are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that in inclusive programs, these contributions also cover pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to supporting medical services. When including those costs versus our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

For America, a national health premium would raise existing Medicare taxes, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. And, like much of federal defense, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the program could be managed by private contractors rather than a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for small businesses like mine. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would render management significantly simpler (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler for us to budget annual expenditures, instead of enduring the complex (and fruitless) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that government play important functions in society, including national security to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It's a better, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It enables for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes are easier to implement. However extending universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes required, would still be a better and more affordable approach for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. The US places significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, based on major studies. Maybe one bright spot in this present circumstances could be that we take a hard look at ourselves and agree that big changes are necessary.

Lawrence Lawson
Lawrence Lawson

A seasoned gaming analyst with over a decade of experience in casino reviews and slot strategy development.